Russ Gibb at Random

Have a read Democrats!

March 18, 2011

This is an article from an UK paper, but it sums up my opinion exactly. Sorry if it does not please you, but this is exactly how I feel about Obama the weakest President in America's History.

President Barack Obama's supporters believed that he had the vision to transform America

Friday March 18,2011
By Anna Pukas (writer for

Let us cast our minds back to those remarkable days in November 2008 when the son of a Kenyan goatherd was elected to the White House. It was a bright new dawn – even brighter than the coming of the Kennedys and their new Camelot. JFK may be considered as being from an ethnic and religious minority – Irish and Catholic – but he was still very rich and very white. Barack Obama, by contrast, was a true breakthrough president. The world would change because obviously America had changed.

Obama’s campaign slogan was mesmerisingly simple and brimming with self-belief: “Yes we can.” His presidency, however, is turning out to be more about “no we won’t.” Even more worryingly, it seems to be very much about: “Maybe we can… do what, exactly?“ The world feels like a dangerous place when leaders are seen to lack certitude but the only thing President Obama seems decisive about is his indecision. What should the US do about Libya? What should the US do about the Middle East in general? What about the country’s crippling debts? What is the US going to do about Afghanistan, about Iran?

What is President Obama doing about anything? The most alarming answer – your guess is as good as mine – is also, frankly, the most accurate one. What the President is not doing is being clear, resolute and pro-active, which is surely a big part of his job description. This is what he has to say about the popular uprising in Libya: “Gaddafi must go.” At least, that was his position on March 3.

Since then, other countries – most notably Britain and France – have been calling for some kind of intervention. Even the Arab League, a notoriously conservative organization, has declared support for sanctions. But from the White House has come only the blah-blah of bland statements filled with meaningless expressions and vague phrases. Of decisive action and leadership – even of clearlydefined opinion – there is precious little sign.

What is the Obama administration’s position on the protests in the Gulf island state of Bahrain, which the authorities there are savagely suppressing with the help of troops shipped in from Saudi Arabia? What is the White House view on the alarming prospect of the unrest spreading to Saudi Arabia itself? Who knows? Certainly not the American people, nor the leaders of nations which would consider themselves allies of America.

The President has not really shared his views, which leads us to conclude that he either doesn’t know or chooses, for reasons best known to himself, not to say. The result is that a very real opportunity to remove an unpredictable despot from power may well have been lost. Who knows when or if such an opportunity will come along again?

Every day for almost the last two months our television screens, radio broadcasts and the pages of our newspapers have been filled with the pictures, sounds and words of the most tumultuous events any of us can remember in the Arab world. The outcome of these events, once the dust has settled, could literally change the world. Yet Obama seems content to sit this one out. He has barely engaged in the debate. Such ostrich-like behaviour is not untypical of the 49-year-old President who burst through America’s colour barrier to become the first African-American to occupy the White House.

Two days after taking office in January 2009, he pledged to close down the prison camp in Guantanamo Bay, which has become notorious for holding detainees for years without trial. Obama promised to lose the prison within 12 months and to abolish the practice of military trials of terrorism suspects. It was an important promise. America’s reputation had been severely tarnished by revelations about the conditions at Guantanamo, by reports of waterboarding and extraordinary rendition (transporting prisoners to a third country for torture) and by the appalling treatment of detainees in Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.

Closing Guantanamo was a redemptive gesture. Two years on, not only is the prison still in use but its future is as assured as ever. Ten days ago, the President signed an executive order reinstating the military commissions at the island prison. Human rights organisations were outraged. “With the stroke of a pen, President Obama extinguished any lingering hope that his administration would return the United States to the rule of law,” said Amnesty International while Anthony Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, declared the President’s action to be “unlawful, unwise and un-American.”

White House spokesmen insisted the President was still committed to closing Guantanamo, which currently has 172 detainees in custody. It was Congress, they said, that had refused to sanction the transfer of the prisoners to the US mainland for trial, leaving no option but to keep the prison open in Cuba. Very little has been achieved in the quest to secure peace in the Middle East. Under Obama, US foreign policy is founded on extreme caution. At first this cool-headedness was a welcome change from the naked aggression of George W Bush and his henchmen Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld.

It is also true that the President is constantly stymied by a hostile, Republican-ruled Congress. But Obama’s apparent reluctance to engage with momentous events is starting to look like more than aloofness. Some tempering of America’s role as the world’s No1 busybody may be no bad thing but under Obama the US appears to be heading towards isolationism. He is hardly doing much better at home. Economically, the US is in big trouble but the national debt is not shrinking.

Ditto the country’s ecological health; the American love affair with the car and oil remains undiminished despite any alleged commitment. But the White House appears to shy away from any tough action. The energy with which Obama entered the White House seems to have all gone in the push to bring in health care reform, which many Americans didn’t want (or still don’t realise they want).

All of which means that it is starting to look as if Obama and the Democratic Party have but one aim in mind for the rest of this presidential term: to get elected for a second. That means not doing anything that might upset any number of special interest or niche groups, which in effect means not doing very much at all. So, not too many harsh but necessary measures to tackle the financial deficit; no clear direction on where America goes with Afghanistan, even though the war there is going nowhere except from bad to worse.

The Obama government can’t even give clear direction on whether the American people are in danger of exposure to nuclear fallout from Japan following the devastating earthquake and tsunami. The US Surgeon General Regina Benjamin advised San Francisco residents to stock up on radiation antidotes, prompting a run on potassium iodide pills, while the President said experts had assured him that any harmful radiation would have receded long before reaching the Western shores of the US.

Yes we can was a noble and powerful mantra which secured for Barack Obama the leadership of the free world. Those than can, do. It is time he started doing.

<< Previous Article: What Happened to America ???
>> Next Article: Our Government In Action

11 Comment(s)

The American President has incredible power that is tempered with checks and balances designed to insure the will of the people. That is a simple reason why Obama has failed. Obama is a socialist. Plain and simple. He is from a corrupt city in an equally corrupt state. The only reason he is still President is because of his color. Any other reason doesn't stand the smell test. We in America are afraid to offend a minority group. That's the truth, plain and simple.

--by MarkMane on 3/18/11   Lives: USA  

wonder when our American media will wake-up to the Obama scam ?

--by tyler on 3/18/11   Lives: Detroit area  

Here is a question for the a Democrat to answer.Ask them to recite the Pledge of Allegiance and when they get to the part about "...and to the (blank) for which it stands, ask them if they know why the word Democracy doesn't appear there or anywhere in the Declaration or the Constitution. Hey, maybe ask yourself the same question!

--by retired teacher on 3/21/11   Lives: USA  

Sadly, comments here reject Obama's audacity in hoping we'd learn to forgive him for being a DARKY! It's the R word, baby, plain & simple. Yes, I know some of your best friends are ....

--by Jim on 3/21/11   Lives: USA  

We have super freak in the WH, a total and unmitigated jerk. Plus refering to him as a "darky" is pure racism.

--by R Simon on 3/22/11   Lives: USA  

Russ, Here is another question to ask.When will Americans who supported Obama wake up to how truly incompetent he is ?

--by Tim Bell on 3/22/11   Lives: Michigan  

I wonder how long it will take Obama to pin the blame for Libya on Bush ? Obama is a shuck and jive con man.

--by D M on 3/23/11   Lives: Detroit area  


Here we go! When are you people going to wake up and get it! Obama/Bush/Clinton/Bush senior....They ALL play for the same team! Oil, energy and insurance companies.

Look at all the conflicts our presidents undertook and it is all the same damn story. Kuait, Iraq, Libya, ALL oil producers. Why did we pick Libya to intervene in and not any of the other countries where the governments are murdering protesters? They have oil! Afghanistan, Somalia we were after their resources. Right now, China is the biggest producer of rare earth elements that we need to fuel our new "green" technology. That is, right behind Afghanistan. Only now are we seeing the Nickel, Lithium and Chromium flow out of Afghanistan after the Chinese slowed production of these metals.

Our government is not interested in human rights or ending murderous regimes, they only want to secure the oil fields and mines of countries we exploit for resources. Just as soon as Europe and China started using as much Oil as we do, now we are fighting for the oil fields to maintain our hold on countries that provide us crude.

Bottom line, No oil/natural resources = No war.

--by No oil = no war on 3/25/11   Lives: Dearborn  

I wish what 'No Oil=No War' said didn't make so much sense. I don't want to believe it.

--by Can it Be? on 3/26/11   Lives: Dearborn  

America can not afford for Barack Obama to be re-elected. With all of the damage that he has caused during his first term, can you imagine the degree of damage and destruction he will do serving four extra years?

--by Taff, Bell on 4/3/11   Lives: Michigan  

So how much damage to our economy has two foreign wars (and get ready for #3) done to the US economy?

Our previous administration marched our military off to a war in Iraq predicated on 100% lies. In Afghanistan, well, no one knows to this day why in the hell we are doing over there! 8 years later and still no closer to catching Bin laden and Al Quida is stronger than ever and toppling governments all over the Middle East.

Now we have attacked, yet another sovereign nation calling it the creation of a "no fly zone" despite the fact that we are clearly attacking stationary targets that are not aircraft or weapons systems. They are government buildings.

If we were not dragged off to war every few years, I can’t help but wonder what our economy would look like. I’m by no means an Obama fan, but I will take Obama-care over another foreign war against Libya any day of the week!

--by You people are blind! on 4/3/11   Lives: USA  

Post a Comment:

I live in:
Number: Please type number 69

Newest Webcasts




Copyright 2019